Home Verdict
AI quality assurance

Stop sampling.
Start seeing every interaction.

Most QA teams review a small fraction of calls, emails and chats, and hope it is representative. Verdict evaluates interactions consistently and at scale.

The arithmetic

Two per cent is not a sample. It is a guess.

A team handling forty thousand interactions a month, with four analysts reviewing five calls an hour, covers about two per cent of the work. Every decision about coaching, compliance and process comes from that two per cent.

100%

Reviewed

Every call, email and chat scored against your card, not a sample of them.

Same

Standard

The same scoring on a Monday morning and a Friday night, for every agent.

Days

Not quarters

Trends visible while you can still do something about them.

What it checks

Your scorecard. Applied to everything.

Verdict does not arrive with an opinion about how your team should sound. We build your existing QA card into it, calibrate against reviews your analysts have already done, and then run it across the lot.

Did the agent follow the process

Verification, disclosure, the steps your policy requires, in the order it requires them.

Compliance wording

The phrases your regulator expects, checked on every interaction rather than on the ones that got reviewed.

How it was handled

Tone, listening, ownership and whether the customer's actual question was answered.

Resolution

Was the issue closed, or passed on, or quietly left for the customer to chase.

Risk signals

Complaints forming, vulnerability indicators and the calls a manager should hear today.

Verdict · week 42, collections queue
Process followed 94%
Required disclosure given 88%
Issue resolved on first contact 71%
Interactions reviewed38,412 of 38,412
Flagged for a manager26

Numbers are useful when somebody can act on them. Every score opens onto the interaction it came from, with the moment that triggered it marked.

Getting started

A fortnight, not a programme.

We start with recordings you already hold. Your analysts score a calibration set, Verdict scores the same set, and we show you where the two agree and where they do not before you commit to anything.

Works withYour contact centre platform, or Titan. Recordings and transcripts, inbound or batched.
ScoringYour QA card, calibrated against your own analysts' reviews.
LanguagesThe languages your queues actually run in, including mixed-language calls.
OutputDashboards by team, queue and agent, plus an export for your own reporting.
EvidenceEvery score links to the interaction and the moment that produced it.
PeopleYour analysts move from listening to calls to fixing what the calls show.
Example week

A week, seen from Verdict.

The screen a quality manager actually keeps open: what was scored, where the week moved, and which interactions somebody needs to listen to today. Sample data throughout.

Scored by day
montuewedthufrisatsun
No analyst needed
82%

of interactions were scored without an analyst listening to them

38,412

Interactions scored

Every call, email and chat in the queue that week, not a sample of them.

26

Flagged for a manager

Pulled out for a person to hear, with the moment that triggered it marked.

94%

Followed the process

Measured on all of it, so the number holds up when somebody asks.

See it running

Open Verdict and read a week.

The demo scores a sample week against a sample card, so you can see the scoring, the evidence trail and the coaching view before you send us anything of your own.

verdict.orion8.tech

Opens in a new tab. Sample data throughout — no real recordings.

Give us a week of recordings.

We will score the lot against your own card, show you what your two per cent sample has been missing, and you can decide from there.